🗿🥚

tool display filters

Group size

  • 0-5
  • 5-10
  • 10-25
  • 25+

Duration

  • <5 min
  • 5-30 min
  • 30-120 min
  • 2-4 hr
  • full day+

Facilitator/participant

  • 1/1
  • 1/10
  • 1/5
  • 1/25

Difficulty

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Online/offline

  • online
  • offline
  • online & offline
back
practice timeline

Governing an Air Quality Data Commons

Shared Cities, Smart Citizens | Citizen Sensing

  • Exploratory research

    Understanding the foundation, context and community of the project through reading the project proposal, plans and reports
  • Focus group

    An in-depth session on the governance structure of Hollandse Luchten with the Hollandse Helden
  • Data use cases as a research focus

    Prioritising the definition of 'data use cases', or how Hollandse Luchten data should be used, as a next step in our research
  • Repair cafe & questionnaire

    Combining sensor repairs with a conversation about data use cases
  • Telephone interviews

    Check-ins with participants following the sensor repairs, and initial conversations about use cases
  • Collaborative coding

    Coding the interviews to extract information about motivation for data use cases, and reiterating this with team members and Hollandse Helden
  • Internal mapping session

    Reviewing the project against the public stack with the Hollandse Luchten team at Waag
  • Data use cases session

    Bringing participants together with experts to analyse the data and decide next steps toward achieving certain use cases
  • Blog series

    A series of discussions, documentation, and analysis surrounding our core research
  • Governing an Air Quality Data Commons

    A public stack approach to governance in the Hollandse Luchten citizen science initiative

The timeline below presents an overview of the steps taken by Waag in the Shared Cities, Smart Citizens project. Our research considered the case study of the Hollandse Luchten citizen science initiative, utilising and developing a public stack methodology to address questions of the initiative's governance through the lens of participants' common values. Further information on our process can be found in our report 'Governing an Air Quality Data Commons' (see below) and on our website.